Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

McInnis v. Ogilvie

McInnis v. Ogilvie
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 24, 1969 · Douglas
394 U.S. 322; 89 S. Ct. 1197; 22 L. Ed. 2d 308; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2170 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Stanley A. Bass for appellants., William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees., Arthur H. Dean, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Frederick A. Ballard, John B. Jones, Jr., and William B. Beebe for the Urban Coalition et al. as amici curiae, and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Elliott C. Lichtman, Benjamin V. Cohen, J. Albert Woll, Thomas E. Harris, John Ligten-berg, Stephen I. Schlossberg, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., and Harold W. Horowitz for the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations et al. as amici curiae. Briefs of amici curiae were also filed by San Francisco Neighborhood Legal Assistance Foundation et al. and by Coons et al.

McInnis v. Ogilvie

Cases that cite this one

48 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions of Urban Coalition et al., American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations et al., John E. Coons et al., and San Francisco Neighborhood Legal Assistance Foundation et al., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.