Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Robinson v. Johnson

Robinson v. Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 5, 1969 · No. 67 · Black, Thompson
394 U.S. 847; 89 S. Ct. 1622; 23 L. Ed. 2d 30; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1707 (United States Reports)

Counsel

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, and Daniel P. Coman for appellants.

Robinson v. Johnson

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.