Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Rosado v. Wyman

Rosado v. Wyman
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 23, 1969 · Douglas, Harlan
395 U.S. 826; 89 S. Ct. 2134; 23 L. Ed. 2d 739; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1175 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Carl Rachlin, Martin Garbus, James Spitzer, and Morton Friedman for petitioners in No. 1539 and appellants in No. 1540., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, Amy Juviler, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip Weinberg for respondents in No. 1539 and appellees in No. 1540., Morris H. Schneider and Jack Goldberg for Barbaro et al., and Alan H, Levine, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Martin M. Berger, and Jerome Kretchmer for the American Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae.

Rosado v. Wyman

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions of Joseph Barbaro et al. and American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted. The motion to expedite review is denied.

The application to vacate the stays granted by the *827 Court of Appeals on June 11, 1969, and June 19, 1969, of the injunctions of the District Court, presented to Me. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, is denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 1539 is denied. The appeal in No. 1540 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission, 393 U. S. 83 (1968); Wilson v. Port Lavaca, 391 U. S. 352 (1968).

Me. Justice Douglas and Me. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.