Boston & Maine R. Co. v. United States
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc., Intervenors (D.C. Cir. 1977)
- In re Boston & Maine Corp. (1st Cir. 1980)
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Long Island Rail Road Company (2d Cir. 1979)
- In re Boston & Maine Corp. (1st Cir. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Carl E. Newton and M. Lauck Walton for appellants in No. 343. Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorney General, and Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, for appellants in No. 480. Howard J. Trienens, Martin M. Lucente, George L. Saunders, Jr., R. Ames, W. W. Dalton, K. A. Dobbins, J. H. Durkin, N. Melvin, T. A. Miller, A. B. Russ, Jr., R. D. Sickler, E. L. Van Dellen, R. W. Yost, and S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for appellants in No. 497.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al. in all cases. Hugh B. Cox and William H. Allen for railroad appellees in all cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 480, Arizona Corporation Commission et al. v. United States et al., and No. 497, Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.