Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Carlos v. New York

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 8, 1969 · However, Roth, Massachusetts

396 U.S. 119; 90 S. Ct. 395; 24 L. Ed. 2d 303; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 103 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1972)
United States v. William Groner, D/B/A Lucky Distributors (5th Cir. 1972)
People v. Bloss (Mich. 1972)
State v. Cox (Wash. Ct. App. 1970)
State v. Hoyt (Minn. 1970)
Commonwealth v. LaLONDE (Pa. 1972)
State v. Carlson (Minn. 1972)
United States v. Thevis (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1971)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
Hayse v. Van Hoomissen (District Court, D. Oregon 1970)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
State v. Hoelscher (Minn. 1972)
People v. Abronovitz (New York County Courts 1970)
Village Books, Inc. v. State's Attorney (Md. 1973)
People v. Kirkpatrick (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice Harlan’s separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455 (1966).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.