Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Fannon v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 1, 1969 · Black

394 U.S. 457; 89 S. Ct. 1224; 22 L. Ed. 2d 416; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2054 (United States Reports)

Counsel

John J. Cleary for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. John A. Tegzes, Susan Langston (11th Cir. 1983)
United States v. Keith A. Miller (7th Cir. 1978)
United States v. Gino Rosciano (7th Cir. 1974)
United States v. Thomas Joseph Chiantese and John Joseph Cerrella (5th Cir. 1978)
United States ex rel. Russell v. Vallee (District Court, S.D. New York 1971)
United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito Lombardi (7th Cir. 1970)
United States v. James Lee Hazelrigg (8th Cir. 1970)
United States v. Earle T. Cook (7th Cir. 1970)
United States v. John Fannon, John Fannon v. United States (7th Cir. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to supplement the record is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in -forma 'pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, ante, p. 165.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.