Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Moya v. DeBaca

Moya v. DeBaca
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 23, 1969 · Brennan, Harlan, Sniadach
395 U.S. 825; 89 S. Ct. 2136; 23 L. Ed. 2d 740; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1173 (United States Reports)

Counsel

William G. Fitzpatrick, Jr., for appellants., Claud S. Mann for DeBaca et al., and Boston E. Witt, Attorney General, and James V. Noble, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico, appellees.

Moya v. DeBaca

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.