Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. King

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 13, 1969 · No. 756 · Are, Noted, Should, Stewart

393 U.S. 321; 89 S. Ct. 556; 21 L. Ed. 2d 517; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2869 (United States Reports)

Counsel

H. Vincent E. Mitchell and J.. Martin Regan for appellant., George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.