Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Sumrall v. Kidd

Sumrall v. Kidd
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 10, 1969
394 U.S. 215; 22 L. Ed. 2d 212; 89 S. Ct. 1019; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2303 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant., Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

Sumrall v. Kidd

Cases that cite this one

34 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.