Sumrall v. Kidd
Sumrall v. Kidd
394 U.S. 215; 22 L. Ed. 2d 212; 89 S. Ct. 1019; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2303
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
34 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Jones (Kan. 1988)
- State v. Nott (Kan. 1983)
- United States v. Hoyt Albert Gaultney and Francis Gilmere (5th Cir. 1978)
- State v. Ingram (Kan. 1973)
- United States v. Thomas Mitchell Goodman (7th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Jackson (District Court, D. Maryland 1981)
- State v. Sullivan & Sullivan (Kan. 1978)
- State v. Smith (Kan. 1978)
- Hollins v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)
- State v. Jones (Kan. 1977)
- State v. Smolin (Kan. 1976)
- State v. Mims (Kan. 1976)
- State v. Burnett (Kan. 1976)
- State v. Burnett (Kan. 1976)
- United States v. Leon Karp (9th Cir. 1974)
- State v. Schriner (Kan. 1974)
- State v. Bly (Kan. 1974)
- State v. Horne (Kan. 1974)
- State v. Morales (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
- United States v. Robert Edward Johnson (5th Cir. 1973)
- State v. Benton (Ariz. 1973)
- State v. Anderson (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973)
- State v. Flynn (Ariz. 1973)
- State v. Gunzelman (Kan. 1972)
- State v. Edwards (Kan. 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.