Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission
394 U.S. 976; 89 S. Ct. 1454
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
166 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation (District Court, E.D. New York 1971)
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson (Supreme Court of the United States 1988)
- CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANGOR PUNTA CORPORATION and David W. Wallace, Defendants-Appellees (2d Cir. 1970)
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (2d Cir. 1973)
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,342 William Dasho v. The Susquehanna Corporation (7th Cir. 1972)
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Shapiro (District Court, S.D. New York 1972)
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,815 Itoba Limited v. Lep Group Plc, William R. Berkley, John L. Read, Peter J. Grant, John R. East (2d Cir. 1995)
- Joel Kronfeld v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. Transworld Corporation (2d Cir. 1987)
- Commonwealth v. Stockard (Pa. 1985)
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Paro (District Court, N.D. New York 1979)
- Greenfield v. Cheek (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978)
- Rediker v. Geon Industries, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1978)
- Elkind v. Liggett & Myers, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1978)
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,186 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Daniel G. Schuman (2d Cir. 1977)
- Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder (Supreme Court of the United States 1976)
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,560 United States of America v. David B. Charnay (9th Cir. 1976)
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,723 Jerry D. Fridrich v. J. C. Bradford (6th Cir. 1976)
- Fox v. Kane-Miller Corp. (District Court, D. Maryland 1975)
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Appellant, v. DATRONICS ENGINEERS, INC., Et Al., Appellees (4th Cir. 1974)
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,069 Republic Technology Fund, Inc. v. The Lionel Corporation v. The New England Industries, Inc. v. The Lionel Corporation (2d Cir. 1973)
- Harold DRACHMAN and Claire Drachman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence A. HARVEY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees (2d Cir. 1972)
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Crofters, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1972)
- Nathanson v. Weis, Voisin, Cannon, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I would grant certiorari in No. 937 and set the case for oral argument. The issues are of general importance, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals ordering cancellation of petitioner’s stock option has sufficient finality to warrant review now rather than after further proceedings in the District Court.
Opinion of the Court
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.