Pease v. Hansen

Supreme Court of the United States
Pease v. Hansen, 404 U.S. 70 (1971)
92 S. Ct. 318; 30 L. Ed. 2d 224; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 416
Per Curiam

Pease v. Hansen

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Whether a welfare program is or is not federally funded is irrelevant to the constitutional principles enunciated in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Reference

Full Case Name
PEASE v. HANSEN, DIRECTOR, CASCADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Et Al.
Cited By
9 cases
Status
Published