Supreme Court of the United States, 1971

Wade v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 29, 1971 · Dismissed, Douglas, Noted, Should, That, Untimely

401 U.S. 989; 91 S. Ct. 1222 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Baker v. Wade (District Court, N.D. Texas 1982)
State v. Pilcher (Iowa 1976)
Schochet v. State (Md. 1990)
Raymond R. Stone v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Etc., Eugene P. Huffman v. James F. Tompkins (5th Cir. 1973)
State v. Trejo (N.M. Ct. App. 1972)
Donald F. Baker v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas, Etc., Danny E. Hill, 47th District Attorney (5th Cir. 1985)
United States v. Brewer (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1973)
Bess C. Boyd, Plaintiff-Garnisher v. Charles M. Bowman and Amelia Bowman v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Garnishee-Appellee (5th Cir. 1971)
Buchanan v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)
Dawson v. Vance (District Court, S.D. Texas 1971)
Dawson v. Vance (District Court, S.D. Texas 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeals from D. C. N. D. Tex. Motion of North American Conference of Hemo-phile Organizations for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 290 granted. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of Younger v. Harris, ante, p. 37; Samuels v. Mackell, and Fernandez v. Mackell, ante, p. 66.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that No. 289 should be dismissed as untimely filed and that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 290.

Reported below: 308 F. Supp. 729.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.