Supreme Court of the United States, 1972

Bradley v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 24, 1972 · Blackmun, Durham

404 U.S. 567; 92 S. Ct. 746; 30 L. Ed. 2d 722; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 3831 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. David Ray, A/K/A David Young (D.C. Cir. 1994)
United States v. W.T.T. (A Juvenile) (8th Cir. 1986)
United States v. Donald Ratliff Cady (8th Cir. 1974)
United States v. Matthew Sylvester Two Bulls, A/K/A Matthew Sylvester Two Bulls, Jr. (8th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Bulls (8th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Pedro v. Spedalieri (10th Cir. 1990)
United States v. Potts (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1982)
Evenstad v. United States (D. Minn. 1980)
United States v. James Cobb (8th Cir. 1977)
United States v. William Thomas (8th Cir. 1975)
Arland L. Gerberding v. United States (8th Cir. 1973)
James Leroy Iverson v. State of North Dakota (8th Cir. 1973)
Ray Allen Tollett v. United States (8th Cir. 1973)
Lee v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa with directions to dismiss the indictment. Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481 (1971).

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Blackmun dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Blackmun’s dissenting opinion in Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481, 483-485 (1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.