Supreme Court of the United States, 1972

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad Co.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 15, 1972 · Per Curiam
406 U.S. 340; 92 S. Ct. 1550; 32 L. Ed. 2d 110; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 62 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Devereux Milburn argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Louis L. Stanton, Jr., Jerome L. Getz, and Frank G. Kurka., E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for respondent Erie Lackawanna Railroad Co. were Timothy J. Bloomfield and Lloyd W. Roberson.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad Co.

Cases that cite this one

37 later published cases cite this decision. The 21 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We granted certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 442 F. 2d 694 (1971), affirming the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, 315 F. Supp. 357 (1970). 404 U. S. 909 (1971). We agree that in this noncollision admiralty case the District Court properly dismissed petitioner’s third-party complaint for contribution against respondent Erie on the authority of Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Corp., 342 U. S. 282 (1952). The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.