Tonasket v. Washington
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES, MONT. v. Moe (District Court, D. Montana 1975)
- Jack Moses, Puyallup Tribe v. George Kinnear, as Director of the Department of Revenue, State of Washington (9th Cir. 1974)
- Tonasket v. State (Wash. 1974)
- Mahoney v. State Tax Commission (Idaho 1974)
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation (Supreme Court of the United States 1979)
- Bryan v. Itasca County (Supreme Court of the United States 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
TONASKET
v.
WASHINGTON ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Robert L. Pirtle argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.
Slade Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Timothy R. Malone, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and William D. Dexter, Assistant Attorney General.
Alvin J. Ziontz argued the cause and filed a brief for Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation et al. as amici curiae.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of §§ 6 and 7 of c. 157, 1972 Extraordinary Session Laws of the State of Washington, and this Court's decision in McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm'n, ante, p. 164.
NOTES
[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Frizzell, Harry R. Sachse, and Edmund B. Clark for the United States; by Charles A. Hobbs and Richard A. Baenen for the National Congress of American Indians; by David H. Getches for the Native American Rights Fund; and by Pearson, Yurok Indian and Trader on the Hoopa Reservation.
William D. Dexter, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, and Eugene F. Corrigan filed a brief for Multistate Tax Commission as amicus curiae urging affirmance.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.