Supreme Court of the United States, 1975

Crow v. California Department of Human Resources Development

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 18, 1975

420 U.S. 917; 95 S. Ct. 1110; 43 L. Ed. 2d 388; 1975 U.S. LEXIS 515 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

American Federation of Labor v. Employment Development Department (Cal. Ct. App. 1979)
Lund v. County of Hennepin (Minn. 1987)
United States Steel Corp. v. State (Minn. 1982)
Claudia Frost v. Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of United States Department of Health,education and Welfare (2d Cir. 1975)
Walker v. Itasca County Auditor (Minn. Ct. App. 2001)
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin (Minn. 1990)
McCannel v. County of Hennepin (Minn. 1980)
Lifteau v. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission (Minn. 1978)
Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital (Minn. 1977)
Joseph Stone, Intervening v. Paul Philbrook, Individually and as Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare (2d Cir. 1975)
Echevarria v. Carey (District Court, S.D. New York 1975)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded with directions to consider question of mootness in light of Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U. S. 393 (1975), and Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney, 409 U. S. 540 (1973). See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). If the court determines that the case is not moot, it should consider whether a three-judge court is required. See Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S. 528, 543-545 (1974); Fusari v. Steinberg, 419 U. S. 379 (1975); cf. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, 716 (1962). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.*