Darden v. Florida
Cases that cite this one
36 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Darden v. Wainwright (Supreme Court of the United States 1986)
- Cutbirth v. State (Wyo. 1988)
- Darden v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Supreme Court of the United States 1985)
- Willie Jasper Darden v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (11th Cir. 1984)
- Willie Jasper Darden v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (11th Cir. 1983)
- Brooks v. State (Fla. 2000)
- Bonifay v. State (Fla. 1996)
- Willie Jasper Darden v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent (11th Cir. 1987)
- Bush v. Dugger (Fla. 1991)
- Mignotte v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- Lopez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
- Carter v. State (Fla. 1990)
- Dugger v. Adams (Supreme Court of the United States 1989)
- Redmon v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
- State v. Helton (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
- Darden v. State (Fla. 1988)
- Muehleman v. State (Fla. 1987)
- Jones v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
- Nicholson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
- Darden v. State (Fla. 1985)
- Darden v. State (Fla. 1985)
- Hoffman v. State (Fla. 1985)
- Bush v. State (Fla. 1984)
- Johnson v. State (Fla. 1983)
- Teffeteller v. State (Fla. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
DARDEN
v.
FLORIDA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Geoffrey M. Kalmus argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Richard W. Prospect, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, dissents and, adhering to his view that capital punishment is in all circumstances prohibited as cruel and unusual punishment by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, would set aside the death sentence imposed in this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.