Blakley v. Florida
Cases that cite this one
44 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Blakley (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- United States v. Richard A. Horn (1st Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Dean S. Vlahos and U.S. Sales Corporation, Doing Business as Data Resources Systems, in the Matter of United States of America (7th Cir. 1994)
- Fedorov v. United States (D.C. 1991)
- In re United States of America (D.C. Cir. 1989)
- Socialist Workers Party v. Attorney General of United States (District Court, S.D. New York 1986)
- Attorney General of the United States of America v. The Irish People, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 1982)
- Eastern Maico Distributors, Inc. v. Maico-Fahrzeugfabrik, G.M.B.H. (3d Cir. 1981)
- Alliance to End Repression v. City of Chicago (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1981)
- Eastern Maico Distributors, Inc. v. Maico-Fahrzeugfabrik (3d Cir. 1981)
- Marianna Giampaoli v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (9th Cir. 1980)
- Raimey v. Wright National Flood Insurance (District Court, E.D. New York 2014)
- United States v. Koubriti (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2003)
- In re: David A. Kessler, M.D. (D.C. Cir. 1996)
- Bennett v. Commonwealth of MA (1st Cir. 1995)
- Simmons v. City Of Racine (7th Cir. 1994)
- Simmons v. City of Racine, PFC (7th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Zanfordino (District Court, S.D. New York 1993)
- Wahad v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (District Court, S.D. New York 1993)
- Solis v. Walker (District Court, S.D. New York 1992)
- Corporacion Insular de Seguros v. Garcia (1st Cir. 1989)
- In re Frederick R. Weisman, Sachiko T. Bower v. Frederick R. Weisman, Frederick Weisman Co., and Rare Properties, Inc. (2d Cir. 1987)
- Kwik Way Stores, Inc. v. Caldwell (Colo. 1987)
- Robinson v. Tanner (11th Cir. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Freddy Duane BLAKLEY
v.
State of FLORIDA
No. 78-1749
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1979
On petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice WHITE, with whom Mr. Justice BRENNAN joins, dissenting.
I dissent from the denial of certiorari. In Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 619, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976), the Court held "that the use for impeachment purposes of petitioners' silence, at the time of arrest and after receiving Miranda warnings violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." The petitioner in this case was tried and convicted for the crime of sexual battery involving the use of great force. On direct examination in the State's case in chief a police officer testified that petitioner refused to make a statement after he was arrested and given Miranda warnings. Defense objections to this testimony were overruled by the trial court. On appeal, petitioner's conviction was affirmed by a divided Florida District Court of Appeal. 362 So.2d 309 (1978).
I would grant certiorari in this case because the decision of the Florida District Court of Appeal is in conflict with Doyle v. Ohio, supra. Indeed, the conflict with Doyle seems sufficiently clear to me to warrant summary reversal of petitioner's conviction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.