Williams v. Brown
Cases that cite this one
31 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Brown v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County (11th Cir. 1983)
- Rybicki v. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS OF STATE OF ILL. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1982)
- Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Merrill (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2018)
- Perez v. Abbott (District Court, W.D. Texas 2017)
- Brown v. Moore (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 1984)
- Brown v. BOARD OF SCH. COM'RS OF MOBILE CTY., ALA. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 1982)
- MOORE Et Al. v. BROWN Et Al. (Supreme Court of the United States 1980)
- Thompson v. State (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 2017)
- North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCrory (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2016)
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. (District Court, W.D. New York 1988)
- Hornbeck v. Somerset County Board of Education (Md. 1983)
- Joseph Thomas v. Phil Bryant (5th Cir. 2019)
- Ala. State Conference of the Naacp v. City of Pleasant Grove (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2019)
- In re: The Nomination Petitions of Daniel B. Smith, Jr. as a Democratic Candidate for State Representative in the 12th Legislative District Petition of: R. Mahmood and K.R. Costello (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018)
- Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Reagan (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2018)
- Patino v. City of Pasadena (District Court, S.D. Texas 2017)
- Marc Veasey v. Greg Abbott (5th Cir. 2016)
- Ohio Democratic Party v. Jon Husted (6th Cir. 2016)
- Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. Husted (6th Cir. 2016)
- Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc. (9th Cir. 2016)
- Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc. (9th Cir. 2016)
- Whitford v. Nichol (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 2016)
- Whitford v. Nichol (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 2015)
- Azam v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
WILLIAMS ET AL.
v.
BROWN ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
William H. Allen reargued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Donald Harrison, John Michael Clear, and Robert C. Campbell III.
Eric Schnapper reargued the cause for appellees. With him on the briefs were J. U. Blacksher, Larry Menefee, and Jack Greenberg.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Turner reargued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. On the brief were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Days, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Elinor Hadley Stillman, Brian K. Landsberg, Jessica Dunsay Silver, Dennis J. Dimsey, and Miriam R. Eisenstein.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of the decision of the Court announced today in City of Mobile v. Bolden, ante, p. 55.
It is so ordered.
[For dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, see ante, p. 94.]
[For dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, see ante, p. 103.]
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concurring.
I, of course, must accept the Court's vacation of the judgment and its remand. If, however, we were to reach the *237 merits, then, in contrast to the result in City of Mobile v. Bolden, ante, p. 55, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE, dissenting.
Because the decision below in this case is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law virtually identical to those in City of Mobile v. Bolden, ante, p. 55, I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion in that case, ante, p. 94.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.