Arizona v. California
Cases that cite this one
70 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Arizona v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 2000)
- Alice A. Platt (Wyo. 2014)
- State of Arizona v. State of California Bill of Complaint (Supreme Court of the United States 2000)
- Ms. S. v. Regional School Unit 72 (1st Cir. 2019)
- George v. National Water Main Cleaning Co. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2012)
- Koger v. Usoroh (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2025)
- Constance Joy II, LLC v. MTU America Inc. (District Court, S.D. Texas 2024)
- Boyd v. Sutton (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 2023)
- Boyd v. Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 2023)
- Boyd v. S&S Management Group, LLC (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 2023)
- Boyd v. Hughes (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 2023)
- Boyd v. Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 2023)
- Woody Partners v. Pirchesky (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2022)
- State ex rel. State Engineer v. San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass' (N.M. Ct. App. 2018)
- Buntin v. City of Boston (1st Cir. 2017)
- In re Sound View Elite Ltd. (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2017)
- Cornell v. Envoy Mortgage, Ltd. (In re Hosch) (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire 2016)
- In re Escarcega (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California 2016)
- Athey v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2015)
- Alice A. Platt (Wyo. 2014)
- Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2012)
- Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast Region (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)
- Estate Partners, Ltd. v. Budzak (In re Estate Partners, Ltd.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2005)
- Old Person v. Brown (District Court, D. Montana 2002)
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New York (District Court, S.D. New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE.
The Court having, on March 30, 1983, rendered its decision on the several Exceptions to the Final Report of the Special Master herein, approving the recommendation that the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, the Colorado River Indian Tribes, the Quechan Indian Tribe, and the Cocopah Indian Tribe be permitted to intervene, approving some of his further recommendations and disapproving others, all as specified in this Court’s opinion, 460 U. S. 605 (1983), the following supplemental decree is now entered to implement the decision of March 30, 1983.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
A. Paragraphs (2) and (5) of Article 11(D) of the Decree in this case entered on March 9, 1964 (376 U. S. 340, 344-345), are hereby amended to read as follows:
(2) The Cocopah Indian Reservation in annual quantities not to exceed (i) 9,707 acre-feet of diversions from the mainstream or (ii) the quantity of water necessary to supply the consumptive use required for irrigation of 1,524 acres and for the satisfaction of related uses, whichever of (i) or (ii) is less, with priority dates of September 27,1917, for lands reserved by the Executive Order of said date; June 24, 1974, for lands reserved by the Act of June 24, 1974 (88 Stat. 266, 269);
*145 (5) The Fort Mojave Indian Reservation in annual quantities not to exceed (i) 129,767 acre-feet of diversions from the mainstream or (ii) the quantity of mainstream water necessary to supply the consumptive use required for irrigation of 20,076 acres and for the satisfaction of related uses, whichever of (i) or (ii) is less, with priority dates of September 19, 1890, for lands transferred by the Executive Order of said date; February 2,1911, for lands reserved by the Executive Order of said date; provided that the quantities fixed in this paragraph, and in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be subject to appropriate adjustments by agreement or decree of this Court in the event that the boundaries of the respective reservations are finally determined.
B. Paragraph 1(A) of the Decree of January 9, 1979 (439 U. S. 419, 423) is hereby amended to read as follows:
I
ARIZONA
A. Federal Establishments’ Present Perfected Rights The federal establishments named in Art. II, subdivision (D), paragraphs (2), (4), and (5) of the Decree entered March 9, 1964, in this case:
Annual
Defined Area Diversions Net
of Land(Acre-Feet) * Acres * Priority Date
1) Cocopah Indian Reservation 7,681 1,206 Sept. 27, 1917
2) Colorado 358,400 53,768 Mar. 3, 1865
River Indian 252,016 37,808 Nov. 22, 1873
Reservation 51,986 7,799 Nov. 16, 1874
8) Fort Mojave Indian Reservation 27,969 4,327 Sept. 18, 1890 75,566 11,691 Feb. 2, 1911
*146 C. In addition to the mainstream diversion rights in favor of the Indian Reservations specified in Paragraph 1(A) of the Decree of January 9, 1979, as amended by Paragraph B of this decree, a mainstream diversion right of 2,026 acre-feet for the Cocopah Reservation shall be charged against the State of Arizona with a priority date of June 24, 1974.
D. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Decree entered on March 9, 1964, and the Supplemental Decree entered on January 9, 1979, shall remain in full force and effect.
E. The allocation of costs previously made by the Special Master is approved and no further costs shall be taxed in this Court, absent further proceedings after entry of this Decree.
F. The Special Master appointed by the Court is discharged with the thanks of the Court.
G. The Court shall retain jurisdiction herein to order such further proceedings and enter such supplemental decree as may be deemed appropriate.
The quantity of water in each instance is measured by (i) diversions or (ii) consumptive use required for irrigation of the respective acreage and for satisfaction of related uses, whichever of (i) or (ii) is less.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.