Frey v. Francis
Opinion of the Court
Sup. Ct. Pa.;
Sup. Ct. Pa.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Ark.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. N. C.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.; and
Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-6919, 504 Pa. 428, 475 A. 2d 700; No. 83-6946, 504 Pa. 455, 475 A. 2d 714; No. 84-5045, 728 F. 2d 1322; No. 84-5170, 102 Ill. 2d 145, 464 N. E. 2d 252; No. 84-5175, 102 Ill. 2d 88, 464 N. E. 2d 261; No. 84-5180, 282
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Frey v. Pennsylvania Stoyko v. Pennsylvania Collins v. Francis, Warden Owens v. Illinois Owens v. Illinois Pruett v. Arkansas Caballero v. Illinois Kelly v. Texas Maynard v. North Carolina Rickman v. Tennessee White v. Kentucky
- Cited By
- 31 cases
- Status
- Published