Supreme Court of the United States, 1984

Heckler v. Kuehner

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 5, 1984

469 U.S. 977; 105 S. Ct. 376; 83 L. Ed. 2d 312; 53 U.S.L.W. 3341; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4235 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

City of New York v. Heckler (2d Cir. 1985)
Kaplan v. Chertoff (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2007)
Wilkerson v. Sullivan (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1989)
City of New York v. Heckler (2d Cir. 1985)
Lou J. RANKIN, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services (3d Cir. 1985)
Holden v. Heckler (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1985)
State of Maryland v. Philip Morris Inc. (District Court, D. Maryland 1996)
Dunn v. Sullivan (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1991)
Wayside Farms, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1987)
Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Heckler (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1986)
Blocho v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (District Court, W.D. New York 1986)
Ernest E. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1st Cir. 1985)
Kuehner v. Heckler (3d Cir. 1985)
Holden v. Heckler (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1985)
Holden v. Heckler (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1985)
Paskel v. Heckler (3d Cir. 1985)
Kuehner v. Heckler (3d Cir. 1985)
Thomas v. Heckler (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1984)
Thomas v. Heckler (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to be remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with instructions to: (1) remand the cases of the named respondents to the Secretary for review pursuant to § 2(d)(2)(C) of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984; (2) make any necessary clarifications in the definition and scope of the class; (3) remand the cases of the unnamed class members to the Secretary for proceedings pursuant to § 2(d)(3) of that Act; and (4) take other actions appropriate in light of that Act.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.