Fisher v. Arizona
Cases that cite this one
50 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- William E. Groseclose v. Ricky Bell, Warden (6th Cir. 1997)
- State v. DeWitt (Ariz. 1996)
- State v. Willoughby (Ariz. 1995)
- State v. DeWitt (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994)
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Riddel (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991)
- Newman v. Maricopa County (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991)
- State v. Cook (Ariz. 1991)
- Engberg v. Meyer (Wyo. 1991)
- State v. Lavers (Ariz. 1991)
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2698 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990)
- State v. Walton (Ariz. 1989)
- State v. Melson (Tenn. 1989)
- John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections (9th Cir. 1988)
- State v. Oliver (Ariz. 1988)
- State v. Tucker (Ariz. 1988)
- State v. LaGrand (Ariz. 1987)
- Depew v. Sullivan (Utah Ct. App. 2003)
- Wingard v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2001)
- State v. Purcell (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001)
- Matthews v. Galetka (Utah Ct. App. 1998)
- State v. Soto-Fong (Ariz. 1996)
- State v. Towery (Ariz. 1996)
- State v. Nieto (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996)
- Barrs v. WILKINSON IN AND FOR MARICOPA (Ariz. 1996)
- State v. Roscoe (Ariz. 1996)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.; and
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 84-5425, 141 Ariz. 227, 686 P. 2d 750.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.