Griffin v. Texas
Cases that cite this one
41 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Nollie Lee Martin v. Louie L. Wainwright (11th Cir. 1985)
- Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. Wainwright (11th Cir. 1985)
- Shaw v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2014)
- Knight v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)
- Darrel Wayne Hill, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellant/cross-Appellee (8th Cir. 1994)
- Darryl Richley v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (8th Cir. 1994)
- Melton v. State (Fla. 1994)
- Ruiz v. Norris (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 1994)
- United States v. Jorge M. Navedo-Colon (1st Cir. 1993)
- Valdes v. State (Fla. 1993)
- Hill v. United States (D.C. 1993)
- United States v. Tavárez (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1993)
- Johnson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
- Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan (7th Cir. 1991)
- Williams v. Chrans (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1990)
- Hadley v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
- Hernandez v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)
- Orndorff v. Lockhart (8th Cir. 1990)
- Paul William Scott v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (11th Cir. 1989)
- Whitmore v. State (Ark. 1989)
- Logan v. State (Ark. 1989)
- Lenson A. Hargrave v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (11th Cir. 1988)
- United States v. Armando Arango-Correa and Hernando Pulido (2d Cir. 1988)
- Fitzpatrick v. State (Fla. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Idaho;
Sup. Ct. La.;
Sup. Ct. Ark.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Ala.;
Super. Ct. Ariz., Maricopa County;
Sup. Ct. La.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Wyo.; and
Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-5792, 665 S. W. 2d 762; No. 83-5818, 105 Idaho 362, 670 P. 2d 463; No. 83-5836, 436 So. 2d 553; No. 83-5849, 280 Ark. 77, 656 S. W. 2d 684; No. 83-5897, 715 F. 2d 1452; No. 83-5905, 437 So. 2d 1072; No. 83-5909, 437 So. 2d 1082; No. 83-5924, 438 So. 2d 774; No. 83-5939, 437 So. 2d 1356; No. 83-5955, 436 So. 2d 1141; No. 83-5973, 438 So. 2d 380; No. 83-5977, 438 So. 2d 374; No. 83-5980, 720 F. 2d 401; No. 83-5999, 672 P. 2d 777; No. 83-6009, 280 Ark. 509, 660 S. W. 2d 648.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.