Supreme Court of the United States, 1987

Illinois v. Kentucky

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 2, 1987

480 U.S. 903; 107 S. Ct. 1343; 94 L. Ed. 2d 515; 55 U.S.L.W. 3585; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 957 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

Brown v. First Citizens Bank (District Court, D. South Carolina 1998)
Boldini v. Postmaster General U.S. Postal Service (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1995)
Presutti v. Felton Brush, Inc. (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1995)
Presutti v. Felton (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1995)
Reich v. Sysco Corp. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1994)
Suburban Construction Co. v. Sentry Insurance (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1993)
Partlow v. Runyon (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1993)
Roe v. Sugar River Mills Associates (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1993)
Nault's Automobile Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co. (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1993)
Macomber v. Digital Equipment Corp. (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1992)
Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L/P. (District Court, S.D. New York 1991)
Chojar v. Levitt (District Court, S.D. New York 1991)
Miller v. Rausch-Alan, Inc. (In re Gamest, Inc.) (Bankr. D. Minn. 1991)
Gonzalez v. Armac Industries, Ltd. (District Court, S.D. New York 1991)
Novak v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1990)
Nemes v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered that the Honorable Robert Van Pelt, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, be appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court. [For earlier order herein, see 479 U. S. 879.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.