In re Shibuya
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petitions for writs of mandamus without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.
Opinion of the Court
Motions of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 26, 1987, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re Shibuya In re Shibuya and In re Shibuya
- Status
- Published