Supreme Court of the United States, 1988

Erickson v. Alltech Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 7, 1988 · Brennan

485 U.S. 943; 99 L. Ed. 2d 286 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

Engberg v. Meyer (Wyo. 1991)
Saylor v. State (Ind. 2002)
State v. Young (Utah 1993)
State v. Gardner (Utah 1989)
Sattiewhite v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)
Fearance v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)
State v. Williams (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
Walker v. Scott (District Court, E.D. Texas 2000)
People v. Rodriguez (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
Evans v. State (Miss. 1997)
Holland v. State (Miss. 1997)
Austin v. Bell (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 1996)
United States v. Murphy (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1990)
State v. Tassin (La. 1988)
United States v. Salerno (District Court, S.D. New York 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan,

Justice Marshall, and Justice Stevens, dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Opinion of the Court

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Motion of petitioner Hogan for leave to *944proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner Hogan is allowed until March 28, 1988, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a petition for writ of certiorari in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Petition for writ of certiorari as to petitioner Erickson denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.