Thompson v. Louisiana
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual, punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thompson v. Louisiana Coker v. Tennessee Hamilton v. Alabama Cone v. Tennessee Walls v. Missouri Murray v. Missouri Harding v. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Remeta v. Florida Jones v. Alabama Andrews v. Texas Blankenship v. Georgia Correll v. Florida Battle v. Missouri Jackson v. Florida White v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Cade v. Alabama Puiatti v. Florida Waldrop v. Alabama Hardwick v. Florida Poyner v. Bair, Warden Poyner v. Bair, Warden Poyner v. Bair, Warden O'Dell v. Virginia Jones v. Missouri Ruiz v. California Mincey v. Georgia Jenkins v. Ohio Thompkins v. Illinois Buehl v. Pennsylvania Daugherty v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Hovey v. California Howard v. California Kimble v. California Mak v. Washington Fleenor v. Indiana Middleton v. South Carolina Stephens v. Kemp, Warden Johnson v. Oklahoma Free v. Illinois
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published