Lee v. Georgia

Supreme Court of the United States
Lee v. Georgia, 488 U.S. 879 (1988)
109 S. Ct. 195

Lee v. Georgia

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Marshall,

with whom

Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231-241 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Even if I did not hold this view, I would grant the petition to establish clearly the minimal due process requirements for state change of venue standards. As I recently argued in Brecheen v. Oklahoma, 485 U. S. 909 (1988) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), and Hale v. Oklahoma, ante, p. 878 (MARSHALL, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), a defendant’s interest in a fundamentally fair trial outweighs the State’s interest in holding that trial in a particular district. It is time that this Court consider the constitutional limits on change of venue standards and assist state efforts to ensure jury impartiality. I would grant certiorari.

Opinion of the Court

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.

Reference

Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published