California v. United States
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision. The 15 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Saucerman v. Norton (9th Cir. 2002)
- Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2010)
- Orff v. United States (9th Cir. 2004)
- Orff v. United States (9th Cir. 2004)
- Shawnee Trail Conservancy v. United States Department of Agriculture (7th Cir. 2000)
- Gardner v. Stager (9th Cir. 1996)
- State of Alaska v. Babbitt (9th Cir. 1994)
- Alaska v. Babbitt (9th Cir. 1994)
- Tyson v. State (Ind. 1993)
- Arizona v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 2000)
- Mannatt v. United States (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 1996)
- State of Arizona v. State of California Bill of Complaint (Supreme Court of the United States 2000)
- Department of Transportation & Development v. PNL Asset Management Co. (5th Cir. 1997)
- Alaska v. Babbitt (9th Cir. 1995)
- San Nicolas v. United States (9th Cir. 1992)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Jerome C. Muys argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Warren J. Abbott, Fred Vendig, Karen L. Tachiki, James F. Roberts, Justin McCarthy, John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General of California, R. H. Connett and N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorneys General, and Douglas B. Noble, Deputy Attorney General, Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona, and Anthony B. Ching, Solicitor General.
Edwin S. Kneedler argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Marzulla, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Edward J. Shawaker, and Sarah P. Robinson. Dale T. White argued the cause for the tribal respondents. With him on the brief were William E. Strickland and Scott B. McElroy.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
NOTES
[*] Richard Dauphinais filed a brief for the Klamath Tribe et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.