Duncan v. United States
Cases that cite this one
52 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Bernard Lee Hamilton v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of San Quentin the Attorney General of the State of California (9th Cir. 1994)
- Campbell v. Blodgett (9th Cir. 1993)
- Campbell v. Blodgett (9th Cir. 1992)
- Campbell v. Blodgett (9th Cir. 1992)
- Campbell v. Blodgett (9th Cir. 1992)
- Robert Jeffrey FARMER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. E.K. McDANIEL; Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Respondents-Appellants (9th Cir. 1996)
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of Corrections (9th Cir. 1995)
- Soto v. City of Concord (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1995)
- United States v. D.F. (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1994)
- United States v. Danny Lee Teehee (10th Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Alperin (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2001)
- Randy GREENAWALT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees (9th Cir. 1997)
- Calderon v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (9th Cir. 1997)
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 1996)
- Armstead v. Parke (District Court, N.D. Indiana 1996)
- United States ex rel. Harris v. Nelson (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1996)
- Jaffee v. Redmond (7th Cir. 1995)
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Liberty Services, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 1995)
- United States v. Jenkins (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 1995)
- Jaffee v. Redmond (7th Cir. 1995)
- Charles v. United States (5th Cir. 1994)
- Jerry Charles, Sr., Jerry Charles, Sr., and McDermott Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States of America (5th Cir. 1994)
- United States v. Wilkie Bill Burtrum, Jr. (10th Cir. 1994)
- Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of California (9th Cir. 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
493 U.S. 906
110 S.Ct. 264
Ovie L. DUNCAN, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 88-7294.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 10, 1989
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Denied.
Justice WHITE, dissenting.
This case involves the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a) (1982 ed., Supp. V), which provides that a court may order a defendant convicted under that title to make restitution "to any victim of such offense." Ibid. In this case, the Tenth Circuit read the term "offense" as used in § 3663(a) broadly: the term does not "restrict a sentencing judge to conside[r] only those acts for which conviction was had, or for which the defendant pleaded guilty." 870 F.2d 1532, 1536 (1989). The Sixth Circuit, by contrast, has "adopted a narrow definition of 'offense' holding that '[a] natural construction of this language would require that the defendant make restitution only to victims of the offense for which he was convicted.' " United States v. Mounts, 793 F.2d 125, 127 (1986) (citations omitted). I would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in order to resolve this conflict.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.