Grossman v. Florida
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Opinion of the Court
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Cal.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Ct. App. Ohio, Stark County; and
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 88-5136, 525 So. 2d 833; No. 88-5169, 36 Ohio St. 3d 80, 521 N. E. 2d 800; No. 88-5216, 844 F. 2d 1464; No. 88-5582, 522 So. 2d 345; No. 88-5750, 38 Ohio St. 3d 252, 527 N. E. 2d 844; No. 88-5799, 38 Ohio St. 3d 29, 526 N. E. 2d 274; No. 88-6005, 123 Ill. 2d 368, 528 N. E. 2d 631; No. 88-6121, 528 So. 2d 896; No. 88-6187, 46 Cal. 3d 97, 757 P. 2d 569; No. 88-6224, 39 Ohio St. 3d 24, 528 N. E. 2d 1237; No. 88-6287, 762 S. W. 2d 121; No. 88-6353, 39 Ohio St. 3d 122, 529 N. E. 2d 913.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Grossman v. Florida Spisak v. Ohio Harich v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Ford v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Clark v. Ohio Beuke v. Ohio Stewart v. Illinois Preston v. Florida McLain v. California Henderson v. Ohio Irick v. Tennessee Maurer v. Ohio Bedford v. Ohio
- Status
- Published