Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States, 493 U.S. 984 (1989)

Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States

Opinion of the Court

*984ante, p. 809;

*985No. 88-1966. No. 88-1979. No. 88-2106. No. 88-2116. No. 88-2127. No. 88-6850. No. 88-6976. No. 88-7139. No. 88-7180. No. 88-7204. No. 88-7217. No. 88-7278. No. 88-7316. No. 88-7388. No. 88-7418. No. 88-7429. No. 88-7435. No. 88-7465. No. 88-7475. No. 88-7491. No. 88-7495. No. 88-7504. No. 88-7514. No. 88-7597. No. 88-7612. No. 88-7619. No. 88-7627. No. 89-69. No. 89-74. No. 89-76.

ante, P 816;

ante, p. 816;

ante, p. 824;

ante, p. 824;

ante, p. 825;

ante, p. 826;

ante, p. 827;

ante, p. 828;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 828;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 830;

ante, p. 828;

ante, p. 906;

ante, p. 835;

ante, p. 835;

ante, p. 875;

ante, p. 900;

ante, p. 837;

ante, p. 838;

ante, p. 876;

ante, p. 839;

ante, p. 839;

ante, p. 844;

ante, p. 844;

ante, p. 879;

ante, p. 845;

ante, p. 849;

ante, p. 890;

ante, p. 849;

*986No. 89-88. No. 89-105. No. 89-160. No. 89-185. No. 89-203. No. 89-249. No. 89-340. No. 89-341. No. 89-5038. No. 89-5040. No. 89-5053. No. 89-5066. No. 89-5081. No. 89-5099. No. 89-5105. No. 89-5143. No. 89-5157. No. 89-5192. No. 89-5200. No. 89-5264. No. 89-5298. No. 89-5330. No. 89-5344. No. 89-5372. No. 89-5373. No. 89-5386. No. 89-5387. No. 89-5409. No. 89-5411.

ante, p. 849;

ante, p. 850;

ante, p. 853;

ante, p. 854;

ante, p. 854;

ante, p. 855;

ante, p. 894;

ante, p. 894;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 883;

ante, p. 859;

ante, p. 859;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 860;

ante, p. 862;

ante, p. 862;

ante, p. 864;

ante, p. 864;

ante, p. 866;

ante, p. 868;

ante, p. 896;

ante, p. 896;

ante, p. 938;

ante, p. 938;

ante, p. 870;

ante, p 897;

ante, p. 888;

ante, p. 888;

*987No. 89-5530. No. 89-5556. No. 89-5642.

ante, p. 899;

ante, p. 899; and

ante, p. 916. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States Zill v. Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc. Fleming v. Moore Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank Johnson v. Johnson Vahlsing v. Maine Streeter v. National Labor Relations Board Woolworth v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Stutzman v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago Jarrells v. Georgia Kerkman v. United States Games v. Indiana Devine v. Herald-Mail Co. Gorman v. United States Doe v. United States Kelly v. Hines-Rinaldi Funeral Home, Inc. Asch v. Philips, Appel & Walden, Inc. Martin v. Townsend Underwood v. Indiana Westover v. United States Van Leeuwen et vir v. United States Potts v. Georgia Forgey et ux. v. Baca State Bank Harnage v. United States Wright v. United States Karaagac v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine Robertson v. California Nelson v. Ingram Love v. United States Noble v. Watkins, Secretary of Energy Patner v. County of Lake Woodward v. State Bar of Georgia Robinson v. Quick O'Connor v. Mulligan Connor v. Sachs Siegel v. Edmonds Co., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan Kenna v. New Jersey Lerman v. City of Portland, Maine Grader v. City of Lynnwood Brownlee v. Alabama Thompson v. Alabama Boyd v. Alabama Church v. Thompson, Warden Davis v. Davis Kinsman v. Georgia Horne v. Allen Metropolitan Housing Authority Tompkins v. University of South Alabama ROTC, Military Science Department Washington v. Martin Tempel v. Valley Hospital Morris v. Christian Hospital Riva v. Getchell Yang v. McCarthy Veneri v. Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania Vinson v. Watkins Lawrence v. United States Army (Fort Hood) Lawrence v. United States Army (TACOM) Cassady v. Adair, Individually and as Superintendent of Montgomery County Schools Perkins v. Illinois, In re Ogden, In re Sobamowo, Zarrilli v. Garrity Brown-Bey v. United States, In re Sparks
Status
Published
↑