Zink v. California State Board of Equalization
Supreme Court of the United States
Zink v. California State Board of Equalization, 499 U.S. 903 (1991)
111 S. Ct. 1100
Zink v. California State Board of Equalization
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Opinion of the Court
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 25, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Reference
- Status
- Published