Sterling v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States
Sterling v. Texas, 501 U.S. 1213 (1991)

Sterling v. Texas

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Opinion of the Court

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; and Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sterling v. Texas Whitt v. California Frank v. California
Status
Published