Neshewat v. Hagstrom
Neshewat v. Hagstrom
502 U.S. 1089
(United States Reports)
Neshewat v. Hagstrom
Opinion of the Court
Ct. App. N. Y.; and
Sup. Ct. N. M. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 16, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.