Supreme Court of the United States, 1994

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided September 26, 1994

512 U.S. 1288; 115 S. Ct. 42; 63 U.S.L.W. 3255; 129 L. Ed. 2d 937; 94 Daily Journal DAR 13510; 1994 U.S. LEXIS 5330 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Boyle v. Johnson (5th Cir. 1996)
Jacobs v. the Florida Bar (11th Cir. 1995)
Alabama State Bar Ass'n v. R.W. Lynch Co. (Ala. 1995)
Jacobs v. Florida Bar (11th Cir. 1995)
Boyd v. Scott (5th Cir. 1994)
Hughes v. Dretke (5th Cir. 2005)
United States v. Lambert (District Court, D. Kansas 2004)
United States v. Lutz (District Court, D. Kansas 2002)
United States v. Logan (District Court, D. Kansas 2002)
Rose v. Johnson (District Court, S.D. Texas 2001)
Rose v. Johnson (District Court, S.D. Texas 2001)
Lawton v. Johnson (5th Cir. 2000)
Rupert v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Texas 1999)
Rupert v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Texas 1999)
Cordova v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Texas 1998)
Thompson v. Johnson (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
Williams v. Cain (5th Cir. 1997)
Williams v. Cain (5th Cir. 1997)
Flores v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Texas 1997)
Christopher Joseph Salazar v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (5th Cir. 1996)
Willie W. Nickel v. Robert D. Hannigan, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, and Attorney General of Kansas (10th Cir. 1996)
Adanandus v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Texas 1996)
Amos v. Scott (5th Cir. 1995)
Siskind v. The Sperry Retirement Program (2d Cir. 1995)
United States v. Manuel Flores, United States of America v. Juan Raul Garza (5th Cir. 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on *1289or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.