Supreme Court of the United States, 1995

Wisconsin v. City of New York

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided September 27, 1995

515 U.S. 1190; 116 S. Ct. 38; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7556; 64 U.S.L.W. 3238; 132 L. Ed. 2d 919; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 5214 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bertha Alicia ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant (9th Cir. 1996)
Mr. & Mrs. "B" v. Board of Education of the Syosset Central School District (District Court, E.D. New York 1998)
Harris v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996)
McWhorter v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2011)
State v. Gamble (Ala. Crim. App. 2010)
Flowers v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2008)
Whitehead v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2006)
Harris v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)
Dobbs v. Turpin (11th Cir. 1998)
Dobbs v. Turpin (11th Cir. 1998)
Baldwin v. Johnson (11th Cir. 1998)
Hill v. Jones (11th Cir. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Briefs of petitioners are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 9, 1995. Briefs of respondents are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, December 8, 1995. Reply briefs, if any, are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, December 28, 1995. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply. Reported below: 34 F. 3d 1114.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.