Supreme Court of the United States, 1996

United States v. Ursery

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 12, 1996

516 U.S. 1070; 116 S. Ct. 762 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

City of Lake Oswego v. $23,232.23 in Cash (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Jeffrey Hazzard v. State of Indiana (Ind. 1998)
Fisher v. United States (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1996)
United States v. Ailemen (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1996)
Ronald J. Smith v. United States (7th Cir. 1996)
United States v. Ralph Vega and James Leonis (9th Cir. 1996)
United States v. Land Contract Vendee's Interest in Real Property Located at 10616 Oakland Drive, Portage, Kalamazoo County, Mich. (6th Cir. 1996)
United States v. John Sardone (9th Cir. 1996)
Valencia-Lucena v. United States (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1996)
Wilhite v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1996)
People v. Westbrook (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)
People v. Prince (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)
Commonwealth v. Higginbottom (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996)
In re 1982 Honda, Delaware Registration No. 83466 (Del. 1996)
Bowman v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1996)
State v. Sunnafrank (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
United States v. $4,299.32 U.S. Currency (District Court, W.D. Washington 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 6th Cir.; and

C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of respondents Guy Jerome Ursery and Charles Wesley Arlt, Sr., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Brief of the Solicitor General is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 23, 1996. Briefs of respondents are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 22, 1996. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed pursuant to this Court’s Rule 25.3. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.