Supreme Court of the United States, 1996

Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. Rambo

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 27, 1996

519 U.S. 1002; 117 S. Ct. 504; 96 Daily Journal DAR 14355; 136 L. Ed. 2d 395; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8637; 65 U.S.L.W. 3396; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 7154 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision.

Ashmus v. Calderon (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1998)
State v. Haselden (N.C. 2003)
Andrew Lavern Smith v. Michael Moore, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles Condon, Attorney General, South Carolina (4th Cir. 1998)
Arthur Martin Boyd, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina Michael F. Easley, Attorney General of North Carolina (4th Cir. 1998)
David Lee Fisher v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections (4th Cir. 1998)
Dawud Majid Mu'min v. Samuel v. Pruett, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center (4th Cir. 1997)
State v. Ceballos (Conn. 2003)
Lyons v. Lee (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2002)
Tucker v. Moore (District Court, D. South Carolina 1999)
Banks v. Horn (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1999)
Mackall v. Angelone (4th Cir. 1998)
Breard v. Pruett (4th Cir. 1998)
Dwayne Allen Wright v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections (4th Cir. 1998)
Royal v. Netherland (District Court, E.D. Virginia 1998)
Weeks v. Angelone (District Court, E.D. Virginia 1998)
Breard v. Pruett (4th Cir. 1998)
Howard v. Moore (4th Cir. 1997)
State v. Bennett (S.C. 1997)
Hoffman v. Arave (United States District Court for the District of Idaho 1997)
Howard v. Moore (4th Cir. 1997)
Mackall v. Angelone (4th Cir. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 13, 1997. Briefs of respondents are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, February 12, 1997. A reply brief, if any, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, March 3, 1997. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.