Supreme Court of the United States, 1999

Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided September 28, 1999

527 U.S. 1068; 120 S. Ct. 10; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8014; 99 Daily Journal DAR 10155; 144 L. Ed. 2d 842; 68 U.S.L.W. 3177; 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4743 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Kleven v. City of Des Moines (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)
Kleven v. City of Des Moines (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)
Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Reno (11th Cir. 2000)
Navegar, Inc. v. United States (D.C. Cir. 2000)
United States v. Truriel B. Nathan (4th Cir. 2000)
Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinion (9th Cir. 2000)
State v. Letourneau (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
Burgess v. Cahall (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 2000)
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2000)
State v. Letourneau (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
Hartson Partnership v. Goodwin (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
In re Adoption of AB (Utah Ct. App. 1999)
L.S.C. v. State (Utah Ct. App. 1999)
United States v. Brown (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, November 12, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 13, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, December 30, 1999. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.