Supreme Court of the United States, 1999

Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 19, 1999

528 U.S. 1015; 68 U.S.L.W. 3351; 145 L. Ed. 2d 404; 120 S. Ct. 523; 1999 U.S. LEXIS 7677 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission (Okla. 2007)
United States v. Health Possibilities, P.S.C. (6th Cir. 2000)
Worsham v. Nix (Okla. 2006)
US Ex Rel. Rosales v. SAN FRAN. HOUSING AUTHOR. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2001)
United States ex rel. Rosales v. San Francisco Housing Authority (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2001)
USA exr/Settlemire v. DC (D.C. Cir. 1999)
United States ex rel. Settlemire v. District of Columbia (D.C. Cir. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 527 U. S. 1034.] The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “Does a private person have standing under Article III to litigate claims of fraud upon the Government?” Briefs are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 30, 1999. Twenty copies of the briefs prepared under Rule 33.2 may be filed initially in order to meet the November 30 filing date. Rule 29.2 does not apply. Forty copies of the briefs prepared under Rule 33.1 are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.