Supreme Court of the United States, 2002

United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 11, 2002

534 U.S. 1102; 122 S. Ct. 865; 70 U.S.L.W. 3442; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 330; 151 L. Ed. 2d 738; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 456; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 407 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

Saylor v. State (Ind. 2002)
Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections (9th Cir. 2003)
United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz Tapia (9th Cir. 2002)
Rene Zambrano v. Jennifer Reinert, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (7th Cir. 2002)
Oken v. State (Md. 2002)
Zebroski v. State (Del. 2010)
Winkles v. State (Fla. 2005)
Chandler v. State (Fla. 2003)
Zebroski v. State (Del. 2003)
Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections (9th Cir. 2002)
State v. Finch (Ariz. 2002)
Bottoson v. State (Fla. 2002)
Bottoson v. Moore (Fla. 2002)
King v. Moore (Fla. 2002)
King v. State (Fla. 2002)
Cox v. State (Fla. 2002)
Sweet v. Moore (Fla. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Petitioner’s brief is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, February 25, 2002. Respondent’s brief is to be filed with *1103the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 27, 2002. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 15, 2002. This Court’s Rule 29.2 is suspended in this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.