Supreme Court of the United States, 2005

Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swifteckrich, Inc. Dba Conagra Refrigerated Foods

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 28, 2005

543 U.S. 1186; 161 L. Ed. 2d 189; 125 S. Ct. 1396; 73 U.S.L.W. 3513; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2083; 2005 WL 443881 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Smith v. District of Columbia (D.C. Cir. 2005)
Arthur W. Fuesting v. Zimmer, Inc. (7th Cir. 2006)
Fuesting, Arthur W. v. Zimmer Incorporated (7th Cir. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether, and to what extent, a court of appeals may review the sufficiency of evidence supporting a civil jury verdict where the party requesting review made a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before submission of the case to the jury, but neither renewed that motion under Rule 50(b) after the jury’s verdict, nor moved for a new trial under Rule 59?”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.