Supreme Court of the United States, 2006

Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 5, 2006

547 U.S. 516 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Carter G. Phillips argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Richard D. Bernstein, Juan P. Morillo, and Steven T Cottreau., Howard W. Foster argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John E. Floyd, Joshua F Thorpe, Ronan P. Doherty, Bobby Lee Cook, and Matthew Thames., Malcolm L. Stewart argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Fisher, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Sangita K. Rao*

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

ADDISON v. BOOHER (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2025)
Guardado v. Fhuere (District Court, D. Oregon 2025)
United States v. Acquest Transit LLC (District Court, W.D. New York 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, granted at 546 U. S. 1075 (2005), is dismissed as improvidently granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Elev*517enth Circuit for further consideration in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., ante, p. 451.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.