Supreme Court of the United States, 2010

Penk v. Nichols

Penk v. Nichols
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 22, 2010
176 L. Ed. 2d 356; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2514; 130 S. Ct. 1894; 559 U.S. 1000; 78 U.S.L.W. 3548 (Lawyers' Edition, Second Series)

Penk v. Nichols

Opinion of the Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has *357repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.