Supreme Court of the United States, 2010

Rodearmel v. Clinton

Rodearmel v. Clinton
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 7, 2010
177 L. Ed. 2d 300; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4630; 130 S. Ct. 3384; 560 U.S. 950; 78 U.S.L.W. 3713 (Lawyers' Edition, Second Series)

Rodearmel v. Clinton

Opinion of the Court

On appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The District Court dismissed for lack of standing, 666 F. Supp. 2d 123, 127-131, and n. 10 (DC 2009), so it did not enter “any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order upon the validity of the appointment and continuance in office of the Secretary of State under article I, section 6, clause 2, of the Constitution.” Joint Resolution on Compensation and Other Emoluments Attached to the Office of Secretary of State, § 1(b)(3)(A), Pub. L. 110-455, 122 Stat. 5036, note following 5 U.S.C. § 5312. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Same case below, 666 F. Supp. 2d 123.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.