Supreme Court of the United States, 2011

Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric

Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 28, 2011
181 L. Ed. 2d 476; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8380; 132 S. Ct. 781; 565 U.S. 1052; 80 U.S.L.W. 3319 (Lawyers' Edition, Second Series)

Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric

Opinion of the Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

*477Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 358.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.