Supreme Court of the United States, 2013

Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 1, 2013

569 U.S. 901; 185 L. Ed. 2d 782; 133 S. Ct. 1722; 81 U.S.L.W. 3554; 2013 WL 1285305; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 2695 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Leonard v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 2015)
In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2014)
M.D. v. Perry (District Court, S.D. Texas 2013)
In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig. (District Court, D. New Mexico 2017)
Dockery v. Fischer (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 2015)
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2016)
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2015)
Lisk v. Lumber One Wood Preserving, LLC (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2014)
Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool Corporation (6th Cir. 2013)
Huffman v. Electrolux North America, Inc. (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2013)
Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2013)
In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, ---U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1426, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.