Supreme Court of the United States, 2013

Paroline v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 27, 2013

570 U.S. 931; 186 L. Ed. 2d 932; 133 S. Ct. 2886; 81 U.S.L.W. 3714; 2013 WL 497856; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4943 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Michael Monzel (D.C. Cir. 2019)
United States v. David Hatcher (5th Cir. 2014)
Teresa Prewett v. Stanely Weems (6th Cir. 2014)
In re the Estate of Pawlik (Minn. Ct. App. 2014)
United States v. Julian Gonzalez (5th Cir. 2013)
United States v. Xavier Degollado (5th Cir. 2013)
United States v. Xavier Degollado (5th Cir. 2014)
United States v. Lundquist (2d Cir. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted limited to the following question: What, if any, causal relationship or nexus between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages must the government or the victim establish in order to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.